According to an article by the Indian Express, the use of AI tools, particularly ChatGPT, in the Indian judiciary has seen notable instances and implications. The Punjab and Haryana High Court recently utilized ChatGPT for insights into a bail application involving allegations of cruelty. The court sought ChatGPT's perspective on bail jurisprudence in such cases, ultimately leading to the denial of bail based on the chatbot's general legal principles and the specifics of the case​​.

The Supreme Court of India, under Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud, has been proactive in integrating technology into judicial processes to address mounting caseloads and enhance transparency. During the COVID-19 lockdown, the judiciary adopted virtual hearings and online dispute resolutions, leading to significant improvements in case clearance rates, particularly in Tamil Nadu's trial courts and the Madras High Court​.

AI tools such as SUPACE (Supreme Court Portal for Assistance in Court’s Efficiency) and SUVAS (Supreme Court Vidhik Anuvaad Software) are employed to assist judges in decision-making and case management. SUPACE helps in managing case loads, while SUVAS is used for translating judicial documents into vernacular languages​.

Internationally, AI's integration into judiciary systems varies. In the USA, AI tools like COMPAS assist in risk assessment and decision support, while the UK employs AI for case management through its Digital Case System. China uses AI to aid judges with case analysis and legal research​​.

However, the use of AI in the judiciary raises concerns about bias, data privacy, and the potential for errors. Stakeholders argue for a comprehensive legal and regulatory framework to ensure transparency, fairness, and accountability in AI applications within the judicial system​​.