Source: Lawyerly

The Lawyerly article reports that the New South Wales (NSW) Supreme Court has revised its AI Practice Note, updating guidelines for the use of artificial intelligence in legal proceedings. This change reflects the increasing role of AI in legal research, case preparation, and court submissions.

One of the key updates is a stricter requirement for lawyers to disclose when they use AI tools, such as ChatGPT, for drafting legal documents or case analysis. The court emphasizes transparency to ensure that AI-generated content is verified and meets professional legal standards.

Another major revision concerns the use of AI-generated evidence. Lawyers must demonstrate the reliability of AI-assisted legal research and confirm that AI-generated citations or case law references are accurate before submitting them to the court.

The court has also introduced new oversight measures for AI in predictive legal analytics, ensuring that machine-learning models used in case strategy or risk assessment do not introduce bias or unreliable predictions into legal decision-making.

Legal experts note that the revised AI Practice Note signals a cautious but proactive approach to AI in judicial activities. While AI can enhance legal efficiency, the court aims to balance innovation with maintaining the integrity of legal proceedings.

The article concludes by noting that similar AI regulations may soon be adopted in other Australian jurisdictions, as courts worldwide grapple with the ethical and practical implications of AI in law.