AI Law - International Review of Artificial Intelligence LawCC BY-NC-SA Commercial Licence
G. Giappichelli Editore

20/02/2025 - Prohibited AI Use Cases: The EU Commission’s Latest Guidelines (EU)

argument: Notizie/News - European Union Law

Source: MLex

The MLex article discusses the European Commission’s newly issued guidelines detailing AI applications that are now prohibited under the EU’s AI regulatory framework. These guidelines align with the AI Act’s goal of ensuring ethical and safe AI deployment while protecting fundamental rights.

The EU has banned AI applications that pose significant risks to human rights, including biometric surveillance in public spaces, AI-powered predictive policing without human oversight, and AI systems that manipulate human behavior through subliminal techniques. Additionally, social scoring systems similar to those used in China are strictly prohibited.

Another major focus is on AI used in law enforcement and judicial activities. The guidelines emphasize that AI must not be used to make final decisions in criminal justice cases or sentencing. Instead, AI should remain a support tool, ensuring human oversight in all legal proceedings.

The article also highlights that companies developing AI systems must implement transparency measures, conduct risk assessments, and ensure AI-generated decisions are explainable. Non-compliance with these guidelines could result in fines similar to those imposed under the GDPR.

Legal experts suggest that these restrictions mark a significant step in AI regulation, positioning the EU as a leader in ethical AI governance. However, some critics argue that strict AI bans could slow down innovation, particularly in sectors like finance and healthcare.

The article concludes by noting that as AI regulation continues to evolve, businesses operating in the EU must stay updated on compliance requirements to avoid legal risks.