AI Law - International Review of Artificial Intelligence LawCC BY-NC-SA Commercial Licence
G. Giappichelli Editore

20/02/2025 - NSW Chief Justice Eases AI Restrictions in Courts: What It Means (Australia)

argument: Notizie/News - AI in Judicial Activities

Source: The Mandarin

The Mandarin article reports that the Chief Justice of New South Wales (NSW) has announced a relaxation of the AI ban in court proceedings, allowing limited use of AI tools by legal practitioners under strict guidelines. This decision reflects the growing recognition of AI’s role in improving efficiency in legal research, document drafting, and case management.

One of the key aspects of the revised AI policy is that legal professionals must disclose when they use AI tools in legal submissions. The Chief Justice emphasized that while AI can assist with legal analysis, final arguments and case presentations must remain under human control.

Another important update is that AI-generated evidence will only be admissible if verified for accuracy. Courts remain cautious about AI-generated legal citations, following past incidents where AI tools produced fabricated case law.

The judiciary also highlighted concerns over AI bias and the ethical risks of AI-assisted decision-making. As a precaution, judges and legal professionals will receive specialized training to understand the limitations of AI tools and ensure AI does not compromise judicial fairness.

Legal experts view this policy shift as an attempt to balance innovation with legal integrity. The article concludes by noting that other Australian states may follow NSW’s lead in reevaluating AI regulations in courtrooms.