Source: VWV

VWV compares the different legal approaches taken by the UK, US, and EU concerning copyright issues related to artificial intelligence. The article discusses how AI-generated works challenge traditional notions of authorship, as most legal systems still hinge on human authorship to grant copyright. In the UK, current legislation does recognize copyright in computer-generated works, but protection is more limited than for human-created content. The US adopts a stricter view, with courts affirming that copyright must be linked to a human creator, thereby excluding AI-only creations. Meanwhile, the EU is working through policy proposals that attempt to strike a balance between innovation and protection, often favoring transparency and ethical usage over full protection of AI-generated content.

The post emphasizes the importance of harmonizing global copyright laws as AI continues to evolve, suggesting that legal frameworks must adapt to maintain fairness and clarity. The article also outlines potential legislative shifts and the growing pressure from creative industries for protection mechanisms that recognize human input in AI-assisted creation. The key message is that nations must continue reviewing and evolving their IP laws to keep pace with the capabilities of AI.