AI Law - International Review of Artificial Intelligence Law
G. Giappichelli Editore

25/08/2024 - Judge Delays AI IP Trial Between Thomson Reuters and ROSS (USA)

argument: Notizie/News - Intellectual Property Law

According to Law360, a federal judge has delayed the trial in the ongoing intellectual property (IP) dispute between Thomson Reuters and ROSS Intelligence, two major players in the legal technology sector. The case centers around allegations that ROSS unlawfully used Thomson Reuters' proprietary legal content to train its AI-driven legal research platform. This lawsuit is significant as it highlights the growing tensions in the legal industry regarding the use of AI and the ownership of intellectual property related to AI-generated products.

The postponement was granted to allow both parties more time to prepare their cases, which involve complex issues surrounding copyright infringement and the legality of using AI to process and analyze proprietary data. Thomson Reuters argues that ROSS violated copyright laws by using its Westlaw legal database to develop a competing product without authorization. ROSS, on the other hand, contends that its use of the data falls under fair use and is essential for innovation in legal technology.

The delay in the trial could have broad implications for the future of AI in the legal industry, particularly regarding how intellectual property laws apply to AI-generated content and the use of data in training AI systems. Legal experts are closely watching this case, as its outcome could set important precedents for the development and deployment of AI tools in law.

The article also notes that the delay reflects the court's recognition of the complexities involved in adjudicating disputes over AI and intellectual property. The case continues to draw significant attention due to its potential impact on how legal research tools are developed and the extent to which companies can protect their intellectual property in an era of rapidly advancing technology.