According to Mashable, AI music startup Suno is facing legal scrutiny after admitting to using copyrighted music in its AI-generated tracks. The company claims that its use of copyrighted material falls under the doctrine of fair use, arguing that its AI models transform the original works in a way that constitutes a new, creative expression. Suno's approach involves using snippets of existing songs to train its AI models, which then generate new music compositions. This practice has sparked a debate over the boundaries of fair use in the context of AI and machine learning, raising questions about the balance between innovation and copyright protection. The legal challenges Suno faces highlight the complexities of applying traditional copyright laws to AI technologies, which often operate in grey areas of legal interpretation. Critics argue that Suno's use of copyrighted material without permission infringes on the rights of original creators and may discourage artists from contributing to the music industry. In contrast, supporters of Suno's approach emphasize the importance of fostering innovation and creativity in the AI music space, suggesting that rigid copyright enforcement could stifle technological progress. The outcome of this case could set a significant precedent for how copyright law is applied to AI-generated content and impact the future development of AI in the creative industries.